[imp] Re: Anyone try eaccelerator?

[liam hoekenga]

Quoting "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy at hub.org>:

>
> Not sure if this is the same problem that we experienced or not, but 
> there is a conditional in eaccelerator.h that is triggered if you are 
> using gcc 3.96 or greater:
>
> /* Handle __attribute__ for nongcc compilers */
> #if (__GNUC__ >= 3)  || ((__GNUC__ == 2) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 96))
> #  define HAS_ATTRIBUTE
> #else
> #  define __attribute__(x)
> #endif
>
> ifyou are using 3.95, it causes the segfaults ... changing the 96 -> 
> 95 and rebuilding fixed the issue on our servers ..

Er... doesn't that say "GNC greater than or equal to 3 OR GNUC equal to 2 AND
minor version number greater than or equal to 96"?  I don't think 
there's a gcc
3.95.

I'm not sure I follow the rest of your message.  Are you what did you actually
end up defining?

Liam