[Tickets #1550] not displaying courier-imap virtual shared folders

[bugs at bugs.horde.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT MONITORED.

Ticket URL: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/?id=1550
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ticket             | 1550
 Updated By         | m.zdila at episoftware.com
 Summary            | not displaying courier-imap virtual shared folders
 Queue              | IMP
 Version            | 4.0.2
 State              | Feedback
 Priority           | 1. Low
 Type               | Bug
 Owners             | Michael Slusarz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


m.zdila at episoftware.com (2005-03-17 13:41) wrote:

First, #shared is not a mailbox, it is a namespace. For example, if user
joe at domain.com will share his folder my-shared, then another user can find
it (subscribe) under #shared.joe at domain.com.my-shared. Directly under the
#shared can be no emails.

Legend:
! php_command, 3. parameter
< sent IMAP data
> returned IMAP data

*** 1. folders are not subscribed ***

! imap_getsubscribed, #shared
> LSUB "" #shared
< OK LSUB completed

! imap_getmailboxes, #shared
> LIST "" #shared
< OK LIST completed

! imap_getsubscribed, #shared.%
> LSUB "" #shared.%
< OK LSUB completed

! imap_getmailboxes, #shared.%
> LIST "" #shared.%
< LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#shared.test at episoftware com"
< OK LIST completed


*** 2. folders are subscribed ***

! imap_getsubscribed, #shared
> LSUB "" #shared
< LSUB (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#shared"
< OK LSUB completed

! imap_getmailboxes, #shared
> LIST "" #shared
< OK LIST completed

! imap_getsubscribed, #shared.%
> LSUB "" #shared.%
< LSUB (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#shared.test at episoftware com"
< OK LSUB completed

! imap_getmailboxes, #shared.%
> LIST "" #shared.%
< LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "#shared.test at episoftware com"
< OK LIST completed

If you wish, I can send you login and password so you can test it. I don't
know if that behavior is broken or not. They say it is according to RFC and
mozilla-thunderbird works as expected.

Some interesting reading:
http://www.gwolf.org/index.php?gadget=blog&action=single_view&id=21
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5677043&forum_id=3308
1

I hope I've helped you :-)