[Tickets #5974] Re: Inconsistent vacation excludes

[bugs at bugs.horde.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT MONITORED.

Ticket URL: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/?id=5974
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ticket             | 5974
 Updated By         | Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>
 Summary            | Inconsistent vacation excludes
 Queue              | Ingo
 Version            | HEAD
 Type               | Enhancement
 State              | Feedback
 Priority           | 2. Medium
 Owners             | Horde Developers
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org> (2007-12-10 03:24) wrote:

I should have added my own opinion. :)

I'm against using the Spam header because different spam filters use
different headers and with Ingo it's really easy to have a spam filter rule
*before* the vacation rule, so this is redundant. In the worst case it even
applies a different spam rule than what the user usually does.

Some additional information: procmail's FROM_DAEMON is a shortcut for:
(^(Mailing-List:|Precedence:.*(junk|bulk|list)|To: Multiple
       recipients of |(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From
      
)([^>]*[^(.%@a-z0-9])?(Post(ma?(st(e?r)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)?
       |daemon|m(mdf|ajordomo)|n?uucp|LIST(SERV|proc)|NETSERV|o(wner|ps)
      
|r(e(quest|sponse)|oot)|b(ounce|bs\.smtp)|echo|mirror|s(erv(ices?|er)
       |mtp(error)?|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR|utoanswer))(([^).!:a-
       z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*)?[%@>\t ][^<)]*(\(.*\).*)?)?$([^>]|$)))

Author's comment: how's that for a regular expression :-)