[Tickets #5974] Re: Inconsistent vacation excludes

[bugs at bugs.horde.org]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT MONITORED.

Ticket URL: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/?id=5974
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ticket             | 5974
 Updated By         | Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>
 Summary            | Inconsistent vacation excludes
 Queue              | Ingo
 Version            | HEAD
 Type               | Enhancement
 State              | Feedback
 Priority           | 2. Medium
 Owners             | Horde Developers
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org> (2007-12-10 10:12) wrote:

> I should have added my own opinion. :)

:)

> I'm against using the Spam header because different spam filters use 
> different headers and with Ingo it's really easy to have a spam 
> filter rule *before* the vacation rule, so this is redundant. In the 
> worst case it even applies a different spam rule than what the user 
> usually does.

That makes sense. Everything but spam rules, then?

> Some additional information: procmail's FROM_DAEMON is a shortcut for:
> (^(Mailing-List:|Precedence:.*(junk|bulk|list)|To: Multiple
>        recipients of
|(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From
>       
)([^>]*[^(.%@a-z0-9])?(Post(ma?(st(e?r)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)?
>       
|daemon|m(mdf|ajordomo)|n?uucp|LIST(SERV|proc)|NETSERV|o(wner|ps)
>       
|r(e(quest|sponse)|oot)|b(ounce|bs\.smtp)|echo|mirror|s(erv(ices?|er)
>        |mtp(error)?|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR|utoanswer))(([^).!:a-
>        z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*)?[%@>\t ][^<)]*(\(.*\).*)?)?$([^>]|$)))
>
> Author's comment: how's that for a regular expression :-)

Woof.