[Tickets #6957] Problem with appledouble Viewer

bugs at horde.org bugs at horde.org
Thu Jun 19 15:22:33 UTC 2008


DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT MONITORED.

Ticket URL: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/6957
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ticket             | 6957
  Created By         | scalero at datadec.es
  Summary            | Problem with appledouble Viewer
  Queue              | IMP
  Version            | 4.2
  Type               | Bug
  State              | Unconfirmed
  Priority           | 1. Low
  Milestone          |
  Patch              |
  Owners             |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


scalero at datadec.es (2008-06-19 11:22) wrote:

Hello, I received a message with 4 'multipart/appledouble' parts(>2Mb  
aprox. each one). And this is my experience about it:

1.- When I open the message my horde session is closed, I use memcache  
for session container. I have follow the code and I see the  
'appledouble' Viewer has a 'new MIME_Contents()' and a posterior  
'$mc->buildMessage()' which cause that each part(>2Mb) is cached. OK,  
this is the cause of my closed session because in memcache the size  
limit per session is 1Mb, Is this right?

2.- I active the Horde Cache driver with local files, and now I can  
open the message and I see 4 cache files(>2Mb) has been created, now I  
can see or download any of them.

3.- Now I go to the mailbox.php view and I continue seeing another  
messages, now I go back to see another time the message with the 4  
'multipart/appledouble' parts but now(this second time) I can not view  
or download the parts!!! when I click the links to view or download  
the 'view.php' page is empty.
     The unique difference between the source code(HTML) of the first  
time and the second is the value of 'mimeCache'. This value changes  
every time I go back to the message.


This is correct?? And by other hand, Is right to store such large  
attachments in cache? It is better than to get directly the  
attachments from the IMAP Server?



Greetings and thanks.

Sebastián Calero.





More information about the bugs mailing list