[dev] Re: marking moved mail as new...

[Ruben van der Steenhoven]

Jan Schneider wrote:
> Zitat von Ruben van der Steenhoven <ruben_donotspamme at webmeesters.nl>:
> 
> 
>>
>>Michael M Slusarz wrote:
>>
>>>More old e-mail...
>>>
>>>Quoting Ruben van der Steenhoven <ruben_donotspamme at webmeesters.nl>:
>>>
>>>| Since the introduction of Ingo a couple of months ago, any read items
>>>| that are
>>>| moved by Ingo to a folder are counted as New items, although they
>>
>>remain
>>
>>>| read.
>>>| Result is, that i get warnings of new mail in folders where there are
>>
>>no
>>
>>>| new
>>>| mails at all.
>>>
>>>Can't reproduce this.  If a message is marked as read, and then I
>>
>>filter,
>>
>>>the message appears as 'read' in the new mailbox.
>>>
>>
>>Excuse the late reaction, was ill last week, anyway:
>>
>>you're right that the message appears 'read' in the new mailbox, but it
>>DOES get counted as new by IMP, that's exactly what struck me as very
>>strange...
>>So if you have new mail notification turned on on the folder the message
>>was moved to, you'll get nagged by messages saying you have new mail in
>>that folder although you haven't.
> 
> 
> Ehm, you actually *have* new mail in that folder.
> 
> Jan.
> 

Sorry Jan,

i must disagree with you on that. This mail is moved there and as such 
it is new, but as mike pointed out, the mail has an UNREAD-flag which is 
off.
IMHO current behaviour is contra-intuitive, because new mail is reported 
in a folder that contains no unread mail, and what is more it is not 
consistent with behaviour of manually moving mail to another folder.
when i move mail manually it doesn't get marked as new, (even the old 
IMP-filters did not mark moved mail as new), but INGO does (as i pointed 
out before, this behaviour is new since the introduction of INGO as 
rule-processor).
Hope anyone can help...

Regs,  Ruben.