[dev] configuration patch: please include
Etienne Goyer
etienne.goyer at linuxquebec.com
Wed Jun 2 06:48:46 PDT 2004
Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> Quoting Guillaume Rousse <rousse at ccr.jussieu.fr>:
>
>> In that case, is it possible to find a correct way to achieve the same
>> without the performance penalty ?
>
>
> I'm open to suggestions, but the system we have is the best I've got
> right now.
I am also packaging Horde/IMP, and I would definitely like something
along the line os what was proposed.
If I understand correctly, the performance hit come from the dir scan
and files opening on each Registry object instantiation. But is'nt the
Registry object cached in most configuration ? If not, that would be a
prime target for caching considering it change almost never between
invocation.
I am not too familiar with Horde Cache. Is it happening transparently
in the background, or it have to be explicitely used such as with the
Kronolith Scheduler ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20040602/aeb2ad2a/signature.bin
More information about the dev
mailing list