[dev] new application [paper]

[Andrew Coleman]

Quoting Bo Daley <bo at darkwork.net>:

> It makes sense to me to make Sesha more generic. I haven't seen Andrew's
> modifications yet, but it would make sense to me if we can create a
> generic category structure (including the ability to create subcategories
> of categories) for 'items'. If we go down that path then the categories
> could be rewritten to use DataTree so they can have a more flexible
> structure.
>
> bo.

Is this a step towards a unifed category/property system such that something
like turba contacts can have horde category and property information, 
just like
a nag task?

--
Andrew Coleman

/-\   The ASCII
\ /   Ribbon Campaign
  X    Against HTML
/ \   E-Mail!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1430 bytes
Desc: PGP Public Key
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20040729/9cb52107/attachment-0001.bin