[dev] datatree performance issue on large installations

[Didi Rieder]

Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:

> Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:
>
>> Quoting Didi Rieder <adrieder at sbox.tugraz.at>:
>>
>>> I just wanted to kindly ask if anything mentioned in this message:
>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.horde.devel/13404> is already
>>> done, or if those plans still exist?
>>
>> Done, no, planned to improve somehow, definitely. If you could create
>> a ticket on bugs.horde.org for every application that does not work
>> with the DataTree driver set to 'null', that would be very helpful.
>
> Actually, I fixed Kronolith to work with the null backend, and didn't
> find any problems with Nag.

? When I use the null backend, then I'm no longer able to add events  
Kronolith or tasks in Nag. Am I missing something?

> Additionally, I'm probably going to implement either shares or perms
> caching or both pretty soon.

Sounds good...

Didi

-- 
-------------------------
Didi Rieder
adrieder at sbox.tugraz.at
PGPKey ID: 3431D0B0
-------------------------

-- 
-------------------------
Didi Rieder
adrieder at sbox.tugraz.at
PGPKey ID: 3431D0B0
-------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20060518/c255b241/attachment.bin