[dev] [cvs] commit: dimp/docs CHANGES

[Jan Schneider]

Zitat von Michael Rubinsky <mike at theupstairsroom.com>:

> Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:
>
>> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>>
>>> We've actually done both, because we often maintain three branches and
>>> didn't track changes from the oldest branch in the HEAD's changelog.
>>> But I'm fine with that.
>>
>> My recollection is that if something happened in HEAD, it was always
>> in the HEAD changelog whether it was released from HEAD or not.
>> Otherwise the HEAD changelogs wouldn't have the 3.1.x notes in them,
>> right?
>>
>> If something happened *only* in a branch without being committed to
>> HEAD and then merged then I agree putting it in the HEAD changelog
>> doesn't make sense.
>>
>> I think we're getting closer to agreeing? :)
>
> FWIW, I'd have to agree with Chuck. At least for the time that I've
> been making changelog entries, if it was a bugfix that was done in
> HEAD and merged to FW_3, I recall putting the entry in the HEAD log
> under the 3.1.x heading and also in the FW_3 log under the 3.1.x-cvs
> heading...and that seems to make the most sense (to me at least) :)

Let's get back to that then, I already restored the changelogs in HEAD.

Jan.

-- 
Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
http://horde.org/consulting/