[dev] [commits] Horde branch master updated.

[Michael M Slusarz]

Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:

>>> I agree about framework not really making sense, but if the  
>>> package is Core, shouldn't the classes be named Horde_Core_*?
>>
>> IMHO, no.  As for Horde:: - we have app-specific "master" utility  
>> libraries called IMP::, Turba::, etc. that naming it Horde_Core::  
>> doesn't make sense.  And I think at this point moving from  
>> something like Registry:: -> Horde_Core_Registry:: is too much  
>> overkill.
>>
>> The package that contains the core files needs to be named  
>> *something* - I don't think we have to incorporate that name in the  
>> class names robotically.
>
> Despite of what I wrote earlier, I think I agree with Michael here.

I don't have strong feelings on this issue, so if someone wants to do  
something with the naming, there is no objection here.

michael

-- 
___________________________________
Michael Slusarz [slusarz at horde.org]