[dev] Abstract vs. Base

[Jan Schneider]

Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:

> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>
>> For abstract base classes, we currently use both (Abstract, and  
>> Base) for the class and file names, i.e. Horde_Db_Adapter_Abstract  
>> and Horde_Cache_Base.
>> We have to agree on one of those, I personally don't have any preference.
>
> I prefer Base. I went back and forth on the Db classes, and  
> eventually stayed with Abstract since it matched the Mad code it was  
> based on. I'm fine with switching it to Base at this point though.

Done. I left out the classed in Adapter/Abstract/ for now, because  
they don't seem to be properly named in a different sense.

Even if we rename them to Base, they should be  
Horde_Db_Adapter_Schema_Base not Horde_Db_Adapter_Base_Schema, right?  
That would clutter the Db/Adapter/ directory though, because the files  
would go into Db/Adapter/*/Base.php instead of Db/Adapter/Base/*.php

Jan.

-- 
Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
http://horde.org/consulting/