[dev] Version naming and PEAR installer
Michael M Slusarz
slusarz at horde.org
Tue Mar 1 19:54:14 UTC 2011
Quoting Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at horde.org>:
> Zitat von Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
[snip]
>> So, the question is, do we want to stick to our well established
>> version naming, to make the transition from H3 to H4 easier for
>> users that are already used to our versioning?
>> Or do we change to PEAR versioning style, to lower dependencies for
>> installing Horde?
>
> The latter.
>
> While I consider "5.0.0alpha1" to be far less readable than
> "5.0-alpha" I get the impression that this change would only really
> affect the "pre-stable" versions. Our former imp-h4-5.0.tar.gz would
> now be imp-5.0.0.tar.gz and something we would have released as
> imp-h4-5.0.1.tar.gz would now be imp-5.0.1.tgz. So once we are in
> the "stable" situation the numbers match quite well. And that is the
> phase that I would say matters most. Somebody willing to try the
> alpha can be expected to deal with a version number that does not
> match to the old scheme.
>
> I think dropping the "h4" mark is more significant than the version
> numbering. But as you mentioned in a recent commit: "We need to drop
> the hN- prefix for package tarballs. Not so much of a problem since
> we manage dependencies through PEAR now anyway."
>
> So I'm in favor of switching to the PEAR scheme.
I agree with Gunnar.
michael
--
___________________________________
Michael Slusarz [slusarz at horde.org]
More information about the dev
mailing list