[dev] Horde_Form_Type naming scheme

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Ralf Lang <lang at b1-systems.de>:

> I noticed that Horde_Form_Type_ccc* are generally packaged together  
> with other
> classes and that their naming scheme differs: They have a lowercase  
> last part.
>
> When converting sesha forms, should I stick to this or put the sesha type(s)
> in own dirs/files and name them according to the general Scheme?
> (something like Sesha_Forms_Type_Ccc*)

I'd prefer to see them split out in their own files.

> I also noticed both Model and Forms ship their own versions of  
> Horde_Form_Type
> - is that part of Model considered ready for general use?

No, not yet.

-chuck