[dev] Horde 6 vs. Horde 5.3

[Michael J Rubinsky]

Quoting Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch at intra2net.com>:

> Hi Jan,
>
> On Wednesday, 15. June 2016 11:16:02 Michael J Rubinsky wrote:
>> > The flipside is, that:
>> > - Horde 6 will delay even further
>> > - we won't be able to do any refactoring, e.g. switching to namespaces
>> > - we won't have a repository split that would make the libraries
>> > more attractive, e.g. by being available via composer/packagist and
>> > thus attracting external developers
>> > - we won't be able to do long-anticipated BC breaks that currently
>> > hinder some development
>> >
>> > The discussion is open.
>
> doing a "maintenance" release before Horde 6 is a good idea.
>
> As MJR mentioned, the removal of the basic view in IMP 7 is a bit worrisome
> for a "point release". On the other hand, if the next release would be Horde
> 6 and users were still using those views, they'll complain, too :)
> At least I'm using the minimal view, but hey, let's move forward.
>
> Could we branch off the IMP view changes
> or would that be too much git surgery?

This would not be feasible.

>
> Thomas
>
> --
> dev mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ
> To unsubscribe, mail: dev-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org



-- 
mike
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org
https://www.facebook.com/hordeproject
https://www.twitter.com/hordeproject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Signature
URL: <https://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20160616/a237215b/attachment.bin>