[horde] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0

Gunnar Wrobel wrobel at horde.org
Thu Apr 19 20:19:58 UTC 2012


Hrm, sorry, not adressed to list.
--
Core Developer

The Horde Project

e: wrobel at horde.org
t: +49 700 6245 0000
w: http://www.horde.org

pgp: 9703 43BE
tweets: http://twitter.com/pardus_de
blog: http://log.pardus.de



Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at horde.org> schrieb:





Andreas Mauser <andreas at mauser.info> schrieb:

>Hi,
>
>----- Nachricht von lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de ---------
> Datum: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:32:47 +0200
> Von: lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de
>Betreff: Re: [horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
> An: horde at lists.horde.org
>
>
>> Zitat von Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de>:
>>
>>> --
>>> Core Developer
>>>
>>> The Horde Project
>>>
>>> e: wrobel at horde.org
>>> t: +49 700 6245 0000
>>> w: http://www.horde.org
>>>
>>> pgp: 9703 43BE
>>> tweets: http://twitter.com/pardus_de
>>> blog: http://log.pardus.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de> schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Nicolás Ilich Samus" <nicolas at unq.edu.ar> schrieb:
>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if it's obvious or a detail, but i think is important
>to
>>>> hold the menus at top if the user scrolls down in the application.
>>>> It's really annoying in an application when is needed scroll up to
>>>> make an action or open another app in a new tab and then scroll
>down
>>>> again to return to the working point.
>>>
>>> The dynamic interfaces we currently have for imp and kronolith work
>>> with a fixed screen size. So I would say that is the direction we
>>> are heading towards.
>>>
>>> If we keep the static views it might be more difficult there. We
>>> don't have a fixed menu for them right now and I'm not certain the
>>> effort would be worth it.
>>
>> We have disabled the dynamic views after many support calls from
>> people using it and only use the static as of now. Not having the
>> static view or something similar would probably mean not using Horde
>> anymore in our case.
>
>I support this statement.
>
>When using Dynamic Views I often get the feeling that not everything 
>plays together, not all is logically aligned, and the most annoying 
>case (at this time) is that not all is dynamic at the moment. Arising 
>questions.

This is the obvious current state and the reason why we want a redesign.

>
>I could see a fully dynamic and logically aligned horde in the future, 

This is the target of the redesign.

Cheers,

Gunnar

>
>or a horde not being (easily) used anymore.
>
>Please dont feel hit on the leg, for I just want also help make horde 
>a super Groupware at all.
>And to mention, I still feel that Horde is best choice, still, in 
>things of Groupware.
>
>Andreas
>-- 
>Horde mailing list
>Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
>To unsubscribe, mail: horde-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org

--
Core Developer

The Horde Project

e: wrobel at horde.org
t: +49 700 6245 0000
w: http://www.horde.org

pgp: 9703 43BE
tweets: http://twitter.com/pardus_de
blog: http://log.pardus.de



More information about the horde mailing list