[horde] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
andreas at mauser.info
Tue Apr 24 16:06:30 UTC 2012
----- Nachricht von Jānis <je at ktf.rtu.lv> ---------
Datum: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:40:24 +0300
Von: Jānis <je at ktf.rtu.lv>
Betreff: Re: [horde] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
An: horde at lists.horde.org
> Citējot Michael M Slusarz <slusarz at horde.org>
> Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:44:59 -0600:
>>> Can you provide more details? Why is the dynamic view no option?
>>> What is missing/problematic about it?
>> I, too, am interested in this answer. Especially since our
>> experience has been just the opposite: nobody uses the traditional
>> mode anymore - only the dynamic (and smartmobile) mode, for IMP at
>> least. All paid development requests in the last 3-4 years have
>> been exclusively for the dynamic view. I personally am no longer
>> actively adding features for the traditional view.
> actually, my users find dynamic view annoying. just our 2 cents
It was them same for me, but since I put some minutes into
understanding how to initial configure the dynamic view in the admin
section, e.g. put all Menu Links in the Buttons/Frames
(IMP/Kronolith), I mostly find my stuff/links again.
But I still agree on the fact, as everyone here, that a default view
must exist so that it looks all the same.
I like the IMP dynamic view. The Kronolith dynamic view looks more
playstyle to me, not so professional, however, I like the calendar and
its functions very much.
In IMP I only can tell that the left frame looks somehow 'overfilled'
and I hope it will become smoother with the designer group the Horde
Awaiting Horde5 with couriosity!
More information about the horde