[horde] Sort names in shared address books

[Jan Schneider]

Zitat von Dominik Erdmann <horde_mailing at der-domi.de>:

> Am 11.10.2013 11:10, schrieb Jan Schneider:
>
>>>>>>> UserA owns an address book. UserB use the shared address book from
>>>>>>> UserA. I
>>>>>>> added a new address book for UserB (filled with the same contacts)
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> shares it with UserA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The sort names option is ignored for both address books for UserB.
>>>>>>> The names
>>>>>>> always sorted by "lastname, firstname". (The view names option is
>>>>>>> correctly
>>>>>>> interpreted.)
>>>>>>> But for UserA works the sort option for both address books. For the
>>>>>>> own ones
>>>>>>> and for the shared ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like UserB simply doesn't have the preference set (correctly).
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay. Where can I set the preference? Under "Preferences => Address
>>>>> Book => Name Format" I set for both users "firstname lastname" for
>>>>> viewing and sorting. Is there any possibility to check the correctness
>>>>> of the setting in the data base?
>>>>
>>>> If you submit the preference form on that page, any incorrect values
>>>> should be overridden in the preference backend. Though you can compare
>>>> those users' values directly in the database of course.
>>>
>>> The SQL statement
>>>
>>> SELECT `pref_uid`, CAST( `pref_value` AS CHAR ) AS `name_sort`
>>> FROM `horde_prefs`
>>> WHERE ( `pref_uid` = "UserA" OR `pref_uid` = "UserB" )
>>> AND `pref_scope` = "turba"
>>> AND `pref_name` = "name_sort"
>>>
>>> returns
>>>
>>> pref_uid   name_sort
>>> ---------------------
>>> UserA      first_last
>>> UserB      first_last
>>>
>>>
>>> I made a new Horde installation on an other server. I exported UserA's
>>> address book and imported it to UserA's account (IMAP authentication)
>>> on the new server and made the same settings for name_sort. But the
>>> contacts are also sorted by "lastname, firstname" and displayed as
>>> "firstname lastname" in the address book window of composing a new
>>> message.
>>> Could it be that IMP does ignore the preference?
>>
>> No. But what does IMP have to do with this now? Until now you only
>> talked about different users seeing different results.
>
> I noticed that the settings I done are ignored. At least it looks  
> like that. What do you think? Maybe it is a turba issue or something  
> else. I don't know the architecture. You are the specialist.
>
> Best regards,
> Dominik

I completely lost you what is working for who in which situation and what not.
-- 
Jan Schneider
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org/