[horde] Mails sent from Horde identified as spam on the sending server
Arjen de Korte
arjen+horde at de-korte.org
Thu Sep 1 13:27:50 UTC 2016
Citeren Volker Then <horde40 at volkerthen.com>:
> Hi,
>
> some of my messages sent with horde (webinterface or ActiveSync
> client) get already filtered as spam by the local spamassassin
> instance:
>
> Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
> [80.131.175.177 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> 0.2 CK_HELO_GENERIC Relay used name indicative of a Dynamic Pool or
> Generic rPTR
> 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
> [80.131.175.177 listed in
> bb.barracudacentral.org]
Question is, why do you run SA on locally originating messages in the
first place? Occasionally, the systems of your users may get infected
by a spam sending trojan, but most of the time it is pointless to
check local messages for spam. In your case, I would configure my
mailserver to only run SA checks on messages entering your system on
port 25 and not the port your users use for submitting messages
(usually port 587).
> It is due to the Received-from header in the horde emails:
>
> Received: from p5083AFB1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p5083AFB1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
> [80.131.175.177]) by ********* (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Thu, 01
>
> It is weird that the client is identified as a relay, it shouldn't
> be like this. Is that more an issue of a wrongly configured
> spamassassin or can that be fixed by horde itself, by omitting the
> client specific received-header? If yes, how would I do that?
>
> I have that issue now with almost any dynamic client IP.
>
> Regards and thanks in advance,
>
> Volker
More information about the horde
mailing list