[imapproxy] Problems with CA and force_tls

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Ryan Novosielski <novosirj+imapproxy at umdnj.edu>:

> I have installed imapproxy v1.2.4 with the following config-file:

I don't know the answer, and I feel like I should warn you that this  
list has seen extremely little traffic recently.

Assuming anyone else is here, does anyone feel that this particular  
imapproxy implementation adds anything special? Or would people be  
okay with deprecating this codebase and pointing people towards, say,  
up-imapproxy?

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris