[imapproxy] Problems with CA and force_tls

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:

>> Assuming anyone else is here, does anyone feel that this particular
>> imapproxy implementation adds anything special? Or would people be
>> okay with deprecating this codebase and pointing people towards, say,
>> up-imapproxy?
>
> Isn't that what we do already?

Perhaps in practice, but then should we take down the bugs queue, the  
mailing list, and archive the cvs module?

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris