[imp] No Inline Images.

[Anil Madhavapeddy]

Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> 
> > The only other thing I can think of, that affects Win32 progs, would 
> > be to recieve a image.jpg.exe.  You would usually see image.jpg in 
> > your attachment window, but it would be executed.  Of course, that 
> > wouldn't work here..
> 
> ? Can you elaborate on this a bit? Will IE really execute programs 
> disguised as jpgs and linked to through an <img> tag??
> 

Nope, it doesn't - I think what Rick was referring to is the common
trick of naming a file something like 'photo.jpg.exe', which would
show up as a harmless photo.jpg when Windows hides the file extension 
(on by default in most installations)

--                      
 Anil Madhavapeddy / "I told you not to flush that!" 
 anil@recoil.org   /    Stern Lecture Plumbing