[imp] Making IMP the first page
Jeremy
jeremy@electrosilk.net
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 06:26:40 +0800
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
> IMP is installed under /home/httpd/html/horde/imp.=20
> I've tried to link directly yo the imp but I loose the
> frame support.
This is what I do and I don't seem to have the problem.
Also my imp install is in the horde directory /home/horde/imp
If there are any errors in the php3 scripts then lots of stuff may not =
display properly - like frames etc. I have turned on warning messages =
in the php config this has helped me greatly in fixing problems.
Jeremy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
# Added for Horde
<Directory /home/horde>
Options Indexes FollowSymlinks
AllowOverride None
order allow,deny
allow from all
</Directory>
<Directory /home/mydomain.com/public_html>
Options Indexes FollowSymlinks
AllowOverride AuthConfig FileInfo Indexes Limit Options
order deny,allow
Allow from all
</Directory>
<VirtualHost 192.168.0.1>
ServerAdmin hostmaster@mydomain.com
ServerName www.mydomain.com
DocumentRoot /home/mydomain.com/public_html
Alias /webmail /home/horde/imp
</VirtualHost>
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:42:20 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 65966 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 23:43:34 -0000
Received: from r93aag000369.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO marina.horde.org) (209.6.192.126)
by horde.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 23:43:34 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id A49D239F2; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:42:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.160 ( [192.168.0.160])
as user chuck@marina by marina.your.mom with HTTP;
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:42:20 -0500
Message-ID: <978910940.3a58fedc4fe29@marina.your.mom>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 18:42:20 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.6-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] suggestions, IMP 2.3
Quoting Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>:
> I'd actually vote for putting the little refresh icon on as many pages
> as possible, to be consistent. It's already in the mailbox and navigator,
> and it couldn't do any harm to place it on the message screen (where
> refreshing would obviously just refresh the message view).
Hmm. Thoughts on this? I can see the consistency argument, but there's also a
desire to avoid interface elements without a (much - I think the flags argument
is pretty weak) use?
> I've been meaning to do this for some time: stick my Courier-IMAP into
> debug mode and just look for unnecessary IMAP traffic in a typical mail
> browsing session. Only thing I can think of is that we retrieve the folder
> list for the top select box every time (or is that in the session now?)
That'd be great.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"If you can't stand the heat, get out of the chicken!" - Baby Blues
>From aghaffar@developer.ch Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 00:27:30 +0100
Return-Path: <aghaffar@developer.ch>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 66647 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 23:44:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zurich.4unet.net) (193.247.80.105)
by horde.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 23:44:44 -0000
Received: by mail.zurich.4unet.net (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id BA5CF50D; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 00:27:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 212.147.11.241 ( [212.147.11.241])
as user aghaffar_developer_ch@localhost by webmail.developer.ch with HTTP;
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 00:27:30 +0100
Message-ID: <978910050.3a58fb62a6c8f@webmail.developer.ch>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 00:27:30 +0100
From: Atif Ghaffar <aghaffar@developer.ch>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <978903608.3a58e238cb603@marina.your.mom>
In-Reply-To: <978903608.3a58e238cb603@marina.your.mom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.6-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] suggestions, IMP 2.3
Hi,
I dont know if it has been discussed before or not.
I have 2 suggestions.
1. Make a separate list for 2.3 (so we can search only it that list)
2. What happened to the frames?
The thing I miss in IMP 2.3 and 2.2.x is that I dont see my folders
and my mails simultanously.
I have been used to Netscape's mail client (except elm and mailx)
for most of my email's management.
With GUI clients I always appreciated the folders to be on the left
while I was reading, so I could easily manage my mails.
Now this idea of going to your folders by clicking on link [Folders]
on the top of the screen and then clicking on one folder to go to that folder
is a little bit timeconsuming for me. (especially when I am on a slow link)
I know a lot of people appreciate the new FramesLess interface, but frames are
also usefull for people who appreciate them.
I hacked both imp 2.2.x and 2.3 to make them frames-capable and look like my
desktop mail client. I would suggest to make both interfaces for IMP (frameless
and framefull) and make that an option in the configuration file.
If you want I can setup a test-site somewhere to demonstrate this functionality.
thanks
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>From anil@recoil.org Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:53:59 +0000
Return-Path: <anil@recoil.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 67569 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 23:54:01 -0000
Received: from total.recoil.org (212.25.240.40)
by horde.org with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 23:54:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 30959 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2001 23:53:59 -0000
Received: from dsl-212-135-236-198.dsl.easynet.co.uk ( [dsl-212-135-236-198.dsl.easynet.co.uk])
as user avsm@localhost by horde.recoil.org with HTTP;
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <978911639.3a5901977d686@horde.recoil.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 23:53:59 +0000
From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <978903608.3a58e238cb603@marina.your.mom> <978910050.3a58fb62a6c8f@webmail.developer.ch>
In-Reply-To: <978910050.3a58fb62a6c8f@webmail.developer.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.6-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] suggestions, IMP 2.3
Quoting Atif Ghaffar <aghaffar@developer.ch>:
> 1. Make a separate list for 2.3 (so we can search only it that list)
Since it's development code, dev@lists.horde.org would be appropriate
to discuss it also.
> 2. What happened to the frames?
They're gone (obviously). It seemed to be one of the biggest requests
from people in general.
> The thing I miss in IMP 2.3 and 2.2.x is that I dont see my folders
> and my mails simultanously.
I might be misunderstanding you, but you can see your folders in every
single page - the select box on the top-right.
> I have been used to Netscape's mail client (except elm and mailx)
> for most of my email's management.
> With GUI clients I always appreciated the folders to be on the left
> while I was reading, so I could easily manage my mails.
> Now this idea of going to your folders by clicking on link [Folders]
> on the top of the screen and then clicking on one folder to go to that
> folder is a little bit timeconsuming for me. (especially when I am
> on a slow link)
I'm not sure where you got this from, but you can jump to another
folder via the select box. You can click on the Folders menu to get
the graphical tree-view, but every page has the short-cut select box.
> I hacked both imp 2.2.x and 2.3 to make them frames-capable and
> look like my desktop mail client. I would suggest to make both
> interfaces for IMP (frameless and framefull) and make that an option
> in the configuration file.
>
> If you want I can setup a test-site somewhere to demonstrate this
> functionality.
>
I would be interested in seeing it, but it seems a bit of a maintainence
nightmare to keep both interfaces in sync (and very hard to customise
as well). I _vastly_ prefer the frameless interface, but that's a
subjective opinion - what do other people who have tried both 2.2
and 2.3 think?
--
Anil Madhavapeddy, <anil@recoil.org>