[imp] asking for an advice

[william wallace]

Thankz Everybody, Thankz ya Alain.

Iam Afraid there is nothing I can do about solaris 2.6 :-(
and If Iam not wrong, IMAP is Unnecesary when ya R using Pop Accounts.
We have Installed IMAP just in case of switch to it some day. Iam gonna 
remember yer advice that day.

Thankz Again !!!.

Pd: Iam gonna deploy IMP 2.2.4 in my computer first, and then I'll move it 
to the Sun.

>From: Alain Fauconnet <alain@cscoms.net>
>Reply-To: imp@lists.horde.org
>To: imp@lists.horde.org
>Subject: Re: [imp] asking for an advice
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 06:01:43 +0700 (ICT)
>
>Quoting william wallace <wwallace27@hotmail.com>:
>
> > Do you know where I can get them ??.
> > And when Are they necesary ???.
> >
> > Thankz in Advance !
> >
>
>Bison and Flex are GNU programs that you can find in source format on
>ftp.gnu.org, but there are pre-compiled binaries on
>http://www.sunfreeware.com
>
>However, they are NOT necessary to run IMP! Neither are they to build
>Perl, MySQL, Apache, UW-IMAP or PHP.
>
>Still, some of the versions you list are VERY old:
>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sun OS 5.6 Solaris 2.6
> > > > > > Perl5
> > > > > > Mysql 3.22.32
> > > > > > IMAP 4.5
> > > > > > Apache 1.3.14
> > > > > > php 3.0.18
> > > > > > horde 1.2.1
> > > > > > IMP 2.2.1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any special advice ????.
>
>At least try to start with newer versions of Horde, IMP and UW-IMAP.
>IMP 2.2.4 is to be released anytime soon. It should be much
>more stable than 2.2.1.
>UW-IMAP 4.5 has some severe security issues I'm afraid.
>Go to 4.7c at least.
>
>I'm still not a big fan of PHP 4 but upgrading might become necessary at
>some point. Still, PHP 3.0.18 should be OK for IMP 2.2.x.
>
>Hem... Solaris 2.6 isn't that up-to-date either :-)
>
>Good luck,
>_Alain_
>--
>Alain FAUCONNET
>Sr. System Administrator
>CS Communications Co. Ltd. (Shin Corp) - Thailand
>
>--
>IMP mailing list: http://horde.org/imp/
>Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
>To unsubscribe, mail: imp-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



>From  Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:31:39 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 17971 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 15:32:33 -0000
Received: from r94aag005136.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO marina.horde.org) (209.6.192.126)
  by horde.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 15:32:33 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 35AF939F2; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:31:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 206.243.191.252 ( [206.243.191.252])
	as user chuck@marina by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
	Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:31:39 -0500
Message-ID: <981127899.3a7ad2dbc9bfb@marina.horde.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:31:39 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: re: [imp] Personal icon

> Thanks for your reply.  However, those emails were sent by other people and
> there're only one recipient (that's me), so, how come the " from " will equal
> to " to " ?  Can you describe it a little bit more clearer ?

From: being equal to To: has nothing to do with it - the personal icon shows up 
when you are listed directly in the To: header (as opposed to, say, a mailing 
list message like this one).

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"My intuitive grasp of math often leads me astray." -Me


>From chuck@horde.org Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:32:56 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 18714 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 15:33:48 -0000
Received: from r94aag005136.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO marina.horde.org) (209.6.192.126)
  by horde.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 15:33:48 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 634B239F2; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:32:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 206.243.191.252 ( [206.243.191.252])
	as user chuck@marina by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
	Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:32:56 -0500
Message-ID: <981127976.3a7ad3283958b@marina.horde.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Feb 2001 10:32:56 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] Refresh of statusbar

Quoting Jan Kuipers <jrkuipers@lauwerscollege.nl>:

> Why does it take several seconds for the statusbar to refresh? When youchange 
> to a different folder, it shows up at the statusbar only after a few seconds.
> What's causing this.

Because we have to trigger the status bar update via javascript when the new 
page loads. So it's a bit delayed.

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"My intuitive grasp of math often leads me astray." -Me