[imp] IMAP-SSL on Solaris

Luis Martinez luimarma@iti.upv.es
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 13:58:08 +0200
Previous message: IMAP-SSL on Solaris
Next message: [imp] Square brackets in filter rules?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,

uw-imap is OK, just remember that to make the whole thing running you should 
make an ssl tunnel from imap port to imapssl port. I recommend you to use 
stunnel for this target. This is done because imp wont know how to deal with 
an ssl connection, so stunnel does it for you.

Have fun,

Luis
On Wednesday 01 August 2001 13:19, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some problems to set up a IMAP-SSL server to use with IMP
> under Solaris 8. I tried the latest version of uw-imap, but it didn't work.
>
> Could anyone recommend me a good IMAP-SSL server to use with IMP under
> Solaris 8?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Jose

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Luis   Javier Martínez Martínez   Instituto Tecnológico de Informática
				  System Administrator
Telf:  34 (9) 63 87 72 33         Universidad  Politécnica de Valencia
Email: luimarma@iti.upv.es        Camino de Vera s/n    46071 Valencia
----------------------------------------------------------------------


>From ljz@asfast.com Date: Wed,  1 Aug 2001 07:58:46 -0400
Return-Path: <ljz@asfast.com>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 65659 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2001 12:00:22 -0000
Received: from brick.recoil.org (195.40.6.160)
  by horde.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2001 12:00:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 26334 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2001 11:53:55 -0000
Received: from hippo.asfast.com (HELO hippo.asfast.net) (postfix@216.182.10.250)
  by brick.recoil.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2001 11:53:55 -0000
Received: by hippo.asfast.net (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 149D91F003; Wed,  1 Aug 2001 07:58:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 198.240.130.75 ( [198.240.130.75])
	as user ljz@mail.asfast.net by correos.asfast.net with HTTP;
	Wed,  1 Aug 2001 07:58:46 -0400
Message-ID: <996667126.3b67eef6e4c67@correos.asfast.net>
Date: Wed,  1 Aug 2001 07:58:46 -0400
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010801102013.00a860f0@pop.uni-bocconi.it> <996664811.3b67e5eb7f767@correos.asfast.net> <20010801124726.A22781@nmrc.ie>
In-Reply-To: <20010801124726.A22781@nmrc.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] Square brackets in filter rules?

Quoting Lars Hecking <lhecking@nmrc.ucc.ie>:

>  
> > This square-bracket filtering is important, because I don't want
> > to filter mail with (for example) the words "important" or
> > "simple" into that folder, only the mail from this mailing
> > list whose subject contains the string "[imp]".
> 
>  The better solution is of course for the list server to stop subject
>  mangling, but that's just me ...

I totally agree.  

But even if this list server stops mangling the subject, in
the general case, I'd still like to be able to filter on subject
strings that contain all sorts of characters, including square
brackets.

After all, I could easily just do To/CC filtering on 
"imp@lists.horde.org" (which, actually, is what I'm now doing),
but my original question goes beyond the filtering for this
particular mailing list, which I only mentioned as an example.

--
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com


>From chuck@horde.org Date: Wed,  1 Aug 2001 08:46:01 -0400
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 68091 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2001 12:47:53 -0000
Received: from 208-59-250-206.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO marina.horde.org) (208.59.250.206)
  by horde.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2001 12:47:53 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 1D79839F4; Wed,  1 Aug 2001 08:46:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.142 ( [192.168.0.142])
	as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
	Wed,  1 Aug 2001 08:46:01 -0400
Message-ID: <996669961.3b67fa09ee932@marina.horde.org>
Date: Wed,  1 Aug 2001 08:46:01 -0400
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <3B67E5C0.1030709@cbpf.br> <01080113580800.10003@pecador.iti.upv.es>
In-Reply-To: <01080113580800.10003@pecador.iti.upv.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] IMAP-SSL on Solaris

Quoting Luis Martinez <luimarma@iti.upv.es>:

> uw-imap is OK, just remember that to make the whole thing running you should 
> make an ssl tunnel from imap port to imapssl port. I recommend you to use 
> stunnel for this target. This is done because imp wont know how to deal with 
> an ssl connection, so stunnel does it for you.

That's partially incorrect - if your c-client library is compiled with SSL 
support, and you compile php --with-imap-ssl, then IMP can speak imaps directly.

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
Some fallen angels have their good reasons.
Previous message: IMAP-SSL on Solaris
Next message: [imp] Square brackets in filter rules?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]