IMP 3.1-RC2

[Jon Parise]

ftp://ftp.horde.org/pub/imp/tarballs/imp-3.1-RC2.tar.gz

-- 
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu)  .  Information Technology (2001)
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/  :  Computer Science House Member


>From eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu Date: Sun,  7 Apr 2002 23:36:09 -0500
Return-Path: <eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 40174 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 04:35:53 -0000
Received: from pcgxmt1.ph.utexas.edu (root@128.83.114.121)
  by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 04:35:53 -0000
Received: (from httpd@localhost)
	by pcgxmt1.ph.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA26048
	for imp@lists.horde.org; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 23:36:09 -0500
Received: from 66.136.201.68 ( [66.136.201.68])
	as user ericr@mail.ph.utexas.edu by mail.ph.utexas.edu with HTTP;
	Sun,  7 Apr 2002 23:36:09 -0500
Message-ID: <1018240569.3cb11e396dde5@mail.ph.utexas.edu>
Date: Sun,  7 Apr 2002 23:36:09 -0500
From: Eric Rostetter <eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <1017853241.3cab35391adc0@mail.ph.utexas.edu> <1017943914.3cac976a39a51@marina.horde.org> <1017957210.3caccb5acf866@mail.ph.utexas.edu> <1018224528.3cb0df90925e0@marina.horde.org>
In-Reply-To: <1018224528.3cb0df90925e0@marina.horde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1-cvs
X-Originating-IP: 66.136.201.68
Subject: Re: [imp] text/enriched viewer

Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>:

> Quoting Eric Rostetter <eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu>:
> 
> > You completely broke it ;)  Sorry.  It wouldn't parse the example
> > in the RFC anywhere near correctly.  Nor the emails I have...
> 
> Woops. :) To be honest, I haven't read the RFC; I just made it handle the 
> one example I have. Also ...
> 
> You broke it too: ;)

Yes, indeed I did, though it actually worked on all 5 messages I tested
(but indeed it was quite wrong).

> The character class you used for this was just that, so the regexps 
> wouldn't match anything that was preceded by either a &, l, t, or ;. That 
> last one is rather problematic for nested tags. :)

Yes, very much wrong :(
 
> I used a lookbehind assertion instead, and that seems to work just fine. 
> Try what I committed this time. :)

Will try it tomorrow and let you know. :)
 
> -chuck

-- 
Eric Rostetter
eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu

Hey Rocky!  Watch me pull a rabbit from my hat!