[imp] imp with courrier imap is too slow
Alain Fauconnet
alain at ait.ac.th
Mon Dec 6 18:10:32 PST 2004
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:50:10PM -0600, Dan H wrote:
> I don't know if this is the default or not but are you using a Maildir
> format or
> an Mbox format? Maildir is wonderful. Much faster than Mbox in my
> opinion.
As far as I know Courier IMAP only does Maildir, so there's no choice.
> I
> get tons of spam every day but I don't experience a bit of lag. Granted I
> don't get 1200 pieces but it isn't uncommon for me to go into my mailbox and
> have over a hundred new messages. And since I'm terrible about putting my
> messages in folders I often have a few hundred messages total in my inbox.
> Never have a problem with speed when using Courier.
Neither did I, or at least they were much less severe than using
UW-IMAP and mbox. I once managed a busy 80K mailbox mail server
running off a not-so-hot Sun E420 server with software RAID-1 SCSI
storage of old technology, definitely not an impressive I/O
bandwitdth. The system was busy but reasonably fast, even under spam
attacks. IMP itself was running off a separate commodity hardware PC.
No IMAP proxy. Many users did have in excess of 1,000 messages in a
single mailbox.
So basically, IMP running in front of Courier IMAP should give you
good performance. If it doesn't, then you have a bottleneck somewhere.
You don't give any information about the underlying hardware, O/S,
filesystem etc. I'd bet that your bottleneck is disk I/O or lack of
memory causing filesystem caches to be ineffective.
You're not accessing mailboxes over NFS are you? This is a real
performance killer.
Greets,
_Alain_
More information about the imp
mailing list