[imp] horde Digest format, replies

[Ralf Lang]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Quite honestly, IMHO it is much easier to read a list via
> individual message anyway.  If using mail filters to filter your
> mailing list messages into separate mailboxes, there is very little
> (if any) benefit from using a digest.
> 

In some projects I follow, replying to digests is discouraged because
it usually does not include the threading-related stuff and often even
the topics are not adjusted. Nobody wants to guess after a week or so
if the activesync-related mail was in topic "Digest of week 20" or
"Digest of 2013-03-05".


- -- 
Ralf Lang
Linux Consultant / Developer
Tel.: +49-170-6381563
Mail: lang at b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlDup1IACgkQCs1dsHJ/X7B51ACfU7ddHqKrC5SVo0+gNXGfQLzQ
OokAnRarsltLU4uKWkemJc1t1jn8FWi0
=0IC5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----