[ingo] Ingo vs Sam

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting "Gary C. New" <garycnew at yahoo.com>:

> I'm trying to decide which spam filtering agent would
> be more appropriate for my full ldap + horde + imp +
> turba implementation.  It sounds like sam was more
> intended for this function, but ingo seems to be able
> to preform some of the same filtering needs.
>
> Is ingo or sam more appropriate for spam filtering?

Sam is a tool for configuring your spamassassin preferences. Ingo is a tool
for Sieve (and now moving towards other general filtering backends, such as
procmail). So your question, as such, doesn't really make sense. You need
to learn more about the tools you're using.

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck at horde.org>
"... It is not more light we need, but more warmth! We die of cold, not of
darkness. It is not the night that kills, but the frost." - Miguel de
Unamuno