[ingo] Re: sieve reply function

[Todd Merritt]

The vacation rule doesn't allow you specify that as an action to a
filter, which is what he's asking for if I understand correctly.

Todd

On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 08:26, Jan Schneider wrote:
> Please keep discussions on the list.
> 
> Zitat von Danny Schales <dan at LaTech.edu>:
> 
> > Jan Schneider wrote:
> >> Zitat von Danny Schales <dan at LaTech.edu>:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Are there any plans to add a reply capability to Ingo when using sieve
> >>> scripts?  If the answer is contributions welcome, can I get a pointer to
> >>> what needs to be done to add an action into Ingo?
> >>
> >>
> >> What exactly are you talking about?
> >>
> >> Jan.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, in the light of morning, I see what I need more clearly now.  I 
> > upgraded our Horde system over the weekend, and began using Ingo as 
> > the frontend to our sieve filters.  The first thing I get is an 
> > instructor wanting to know how to set up a reply function like the 
> > old system had (a perl script called websieve.pl), so I assumed sieve 
> > had a reply function.  It does, it's called vacation.  The websieve 
> > package was using the vacation command to act as an autoreplyer, so 
> > basically a user could create a rule like this:
> >
> > if allof (header :contains "subject" "MEEN292") {
> >      vacation :days 2 :addresses ["XXXXX at latech.edu"] text:
> > Your MEEN 292 lab submission has been received.
> > .
> > ;
> > }
> >
> >
> > Is it possible to do this in Ingo, or can I hack it in with only 
> > rudimentary PHP skills?
> 
> That's what Ingo's Vacation rule is for.
> 
> Jan.
> 
> -- 
> Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
> http://horde.org/consulting/