[ingo] ingo and mail-loops.

[Josh Kelley]

On 2/16/06, Cliff Green <green at umdnj.edu> wrote:
> Václav Hůla wrote:
> >  we are using horde/imp/ingo here at university, and lots of users use
> > default "forward" rule. The problem is that the generated procmail rule has
> > no mailloop protection,
> Actually, on sober reflection (and a closer look at the procmail.php
> script), it already has X-Loop protection.  So what mailloop problems
> are you having?

Only Ingo's vacation rules have X-Loop protection; forward rules do not.

I ran into this a while ago, hacked together a patch, and never got
around to cleaning it up and posting it.  I finally did; see
http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/?id=3502.

Josh Kelley