[ingo] Questions about .procmailrc (ingo rules)

[Ben Chavet]

Quoting Michael M Slusarz <slusarz at horde.org>:

> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>
>> Zitat von Shane Williams <broot at ischool.utexas.edu>:
>>
>>> I have to say, the "stop checking" option trips up a lot of people.
>>> Our users' expectations are that filters will not pass a copy on to
>>> further filters.  As such, I think it should be checked by default for
>>> new rules (Actually, I think it should be reworded and the logic
>>> flipped, so you have to check a box to pass a copy on down the line,
>>> but I'm not in charge).
>>>
>>> There's probably some more elegant way to do this, but replacing
>>> line 49 from templates/rule/footer.inc (this is in Ingo 1.1) with this
>>> line:
>>>
>>> <input type="checkbox" name="stop" value="1"<?php if (!       
>>> isset($actionID)) { echo 'checked="checked"';} else { echo       
>>> ($rule['stop']) ? 'checked="checked"' : '' ;}?>> <?php echo   
>>> _("Stop    checking if this rule matches?") ?>
>>>
>>> seems to do the trick without messing anything else up.  Someone
>>> please let me know if I'm totally off-base on this.
>>
>> No, this is the correct solution for you want to achieve.
>>
>> I would like to hear other people's opinion whether this flag should
>> be enabled by default.
>
> I also thing this flag should be enabled by default.  Or, in the
> alternative, make the UI display "Continue applying filters?" or
> something similar, make the default No, and make the user have to
> actively select the option.

I also agree.  This is the one thing that I have to explain to every  
user that tries to set up their own filters.

--Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/ingo/attachments/20060425/e3c86806/attachment.bin