[ingo] Better Ingo default rules
Jan Schneider
jan at horde.org
Tue Dec 9 10:19:01 UTC 2014
Zitat von Daniel Vollbrecht <d.vollbrecht at scram.de>:
> Hi all,
>
> so far I used to customize the Ingo standard rules with
> $_prefs['rules']. In the current version, I couldn't succeed in
> doing so yet. Maybe somewhere it is documented what exactly the
> string like "i:1;a:3" means...? The current version seems to ignore
> my previously working string.
It's a serialized PHP array: http://php.net/serialize
> Moreover, I noticed that the default rule order of a fresh
> installation doesn't make much sense:
>
> whitelist, blacklist, vacation, forwarding, spam
>
> In particular, spam should be handled no later than after the
> blacklist and at least before vacation and forwarding. Who wants to
> forward all the spam and reply to them with an absent note
> (concerning the keyword 'backscatter')?
>
> So first all spam related rules (white-/blacklist, spam) and then
> ham related rules (vacation, forwarding).
Yes, makes sense. Forwarding may be debatable, at least for the
forward-all use case. Though in this case you only need one single
rule anyway.
> Is there any deeper sense for that or would my proposal to ship ingo
> with improved defaults be worth to be considered?
Absolutely.
> How can I adjust these rules to my desired order? 95% of my mail
> users don't know about those things and thus don't touch anything
> except setting spam filtering active. Therefore, I would be happy to
> have meaningful out of the box settings.
$_prefs['rules'] from above.
--
Jan Schneider
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org/
https://www.facebook.com/hordeproject
More information about the ingo
mailing list