Off to O'Reilly
Jon Parise
jon@horde.org
Sun, 22 Jul 2001 00:39:02 -0400
Like Chuck, I'll be away this coming week at the O'Reilly Open
Source Convention. I'm not sure how often I'll be reading my
mail, so responses may be slow in coming.
I'm looking forward to spending the week in the "PHP Conference",
though, and if any of you also plan on attending, please find me
to say howdy.
/away O'Reilly Convention in San Diego!
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member
>From tdavis@birddog.com Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:30:49 -0500
Return-Path: <tdavis@birddog.com>
Mailing-List: contact nag-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list nag@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 31017 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 20:32:39 -0000
Received: from softdnserror (HELO hermes.birddog.com) (63.125.164.131)
by horde.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 20:32:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (prometheus.birddog.com [10.2.0.4])
by hermes.birddog.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f87KWeF07118
for <nag@lists.horde.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:32:40 -0500
Received: from 10.10.10.200 ( [10.10.10.200])
as user td@imap.birddog.com by secure.birddog.com with HTTP;
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:30:49 -0500
Message-ID: <999894649.3b992e79d875c@secure.birddog.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:30:49 -0500
From: Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>
To: nag@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
X-Originating-IP: 10.10.10.200
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 1.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Subject: multiuser?
Are the multiuser functions written into nag at this time?
--
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:41:18 -0400
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact nag-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list nag@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 31301 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 20:41:50 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.198.7)
by horde.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 20:41:50 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 3783539F6; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:41:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 206.243.191.252 ( [206.243.191.252])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:41:18 -0400
Message-ID: <999895278.3b9930ee0a6fa@marina.horde.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:41:18 -0400
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: nag@lists.horde.org
References: <999894649.3b992e79d875c@secure.birddog.com>
In-Reply-To: <999894649.3b992e79d875c@secure.birddog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [nag] multiuser?
Quoting Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>:
> Are the multiuser functions written into nag at this time?
No.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
Some fallen angels have their good reasons.
>From tdavis@birddog.com Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:41:23 -0500
Return-Path: <tdavis@birddog.com>
Mailing-List: contact nag-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list nag@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 46387 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 02:43:14 -0000
Received: from softdnserror (HELO hermes.birddog.com) (63.125.164.131)
by horde.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 02:43:14 -0000
Received: from localhost (prometheus.birddog.com [10.2.0.4])
by hermes.birddog.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f882hGF12327
for <nag@lists.horde.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:43:16 -0500
Received: from 10.10.4.1 ( [10.10.4.1])
as user td@imap.birddog.com by secure.birddog.com with HTTP;
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:41:23 -0500
Message-ID: <999916883.3b99855380d6b@secure.birddog.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:41:23 -0500
From: Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>
To: nag@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
X-Originating-IP: 10.10.4.1
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 1.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Subject: uses of nag
Hello,
I am kinda curious as to what others are using nag for as opposed to
kronolith. They seem to be quite related.
Thank you,
--
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>From janmailing@gmx.de Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:31:21 +0200
Return-Path: <janmailing@gmx.de>
Mailing-List: contact nag-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list nag@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 57085 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 10:35:00 -0000
Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (HELO mailout05.sul.t-online.de) (194.25.134.82)
by horde.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 10:35:00 -0000
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de
by mailout05.sul.t-online.de with smtp
id 15ffRy-0002vZ-0A; Sat, 08 Sep 2001 12:34:58 +0200
Received: from linux.wg.de (320034214675-0001@[217.80.108.140]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 15ffRv-0xmlGqC; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:34:55 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.wg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id f88AVLV13368
for <nag@lists.horde.org>; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:31:21 +0200
Received: from 192.168.60.1 ( [192.168.60.1])
as user jan@mail.wg.de by linux.wg.de with HTTP;
Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:31:21 +0200
Message-ID: <999945081.3b99f37904ee3@linux.wg.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:31:21 +0200
From: Jan Schneider <janmailing@gmx.de>
To: nag@lists.horde.org
References: <999916883.3b99855380d6b@secure.birddog.com>
In-Reply-To: <999916883.3b99855380d6b@secure.birddog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
X-Sender: 320034214675-0001@t-dialin.net
Subject: Re: [nag] uses of nag
Zitat von Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I am kinda curious as to what others are using nag for as opposed to
> kronolith. They seem to be quite related.
Nag is a todo list manager and kronolith is a calendar. What's more to say?
Jan.