[nag] Distinction between shared task lists

[Brian Keifer]

Hi, again.

It was brought to my attention (thanks, Chris) that the usernames shown on the
summary screen by the original patch didn't line up when due dates were used on
some tasks.  That's fixed in this diff.  (If you applied the last one, you'll
want to revert and re-patch with this one.)

Thanks!

> ----- Message from brian@valinor.net ---------
>     Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2002 23:05:36 -0500
>     From: Brian Keifer <brian@valinor.net>
> Reply-To: Brian Keifer <brian@valinor.net>
>  Subject: [nag] Distinction between shared task lists
>       To: nag@lists.horde.org
> 
> Hi, list.
> 
> I'm getting ready to roll out a horde mini-intranet for our little group of
> sysadmins.  One of the things that Nag is missing is the ability to see
> multiple
> users' task lists but also have some way to identify what tasks belong to
> which
> user.  A couple of hours and a few cans of Mountain Dew(tm) later, I give you
> the attached diff.
> 
> 
> It adds several features to Nag:
> 
> 1)  A preference to show/hide the username of each task's owner in the
> summary
> view.  See it in action at: http://valinor.net/ss/tasks_username_patch1.png
> 
> 2)  A preference to group task lists by username.  If this is enabled, the
> tasks
> are grouped by username and then sorted by whatever your default sort
> criteria
> is.  For example, sorting by priority used to give you:
> 
> Sue - 1 - Buy more Dew
> Joe - 2 - Fix the window
> Sue - 3 - Feed the badgers
> Tom - 4 - Mop the floor
> Sue - 5 - Paint the fence
> 
> With this pref enabled, it would be more like this:
> 
> Sue - 1 - Buy more Dew
> Sue - 3 - Feed the badgers
> Sue - 5 - Paint the fence
> Joe - 2 - Fix the window
> Tom - 4 - Mop the floor
> 
> 
> 3) In Nag's task list, an extra column has been added that displays the
> username.  The obligatory screenshot is at:
> http://valinor.net/ss/tasks_username_patch2.png
> 
> 
> Take a look at the patch and kick the tires.  Commit it if you like, hack it
> to
> bits if you don't. =)
> 
> -Brian
> 
> ----- End message from brian@valinor.net -----