[sork] Branch names

[Eric Rostetter]

Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>:

> Is there a reason that the Sork modules all have RELENG_2 branches, when 
> they haven't gone through a 1.0 release yet?

They did have a 1.0 "release" before they became part of CVS.

At the time of import into CVS, it was already at 2.0, so they were
imported as RELENG_2.  I never bothered to save any of the older versions,
so I had no 1.0 to commit/import.

> Any objections to trying to 
> change the branch to RELENG_1, leaving RELENG_2 for making a 2.0 release?

It would make the versions very inconsistent, making essentially two version
1 releases, and eventually two version 2 releases.

I admit that the version tracking/labeling in the modules has been done
really poorly, and not updated consistently throughout (docs, version file,
etc).  I'm hoping to change this in the near future by actually trying to
come up with a code versioning scheme and stick to it.

> -chuck

-- 
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

"TAD (Technology Attachment Disorder) is an unshakable, impractical devotion
to a brand, platform, product line, or programming language. It's relatively
harmless among the rank and file, but when management is afflicted the damage
can be measured in dollars. It's also contagious -- someone with sufficient
political clout can infect an entire organization."

--"Enterprise Strategies" columnist Tom Yager.