[sork] unified sork?
Mike Cochrane
mike@graftonhall.co.nz
Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:22:09 +1200
I'm all for this. I'm more then happy to have changed/change ingo to suit this
as it replaces vacations and forwards in some configs.
I would like to see a single icon for sork and from there you have application
menu icons for passwords, filters, vacation, forwards, SAM etc... what ever the
admin enables.
And I would like to see things moved to a servers.php style config setup with a
prefered system for drivers.
So for one domain you could have forwards and vacation and another you could
have ingo. For one have the sql password driver and for another a ldap driver
etc....
- Mike :-)
> ----- Message from chuck@horde.org ---------
> Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 11:43:15 -0400
> From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
> Reply-To: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
> Subject: [sork] unified sork?
> To: sork@lists.horde.org
>
> Eric & folks... what are the thoughts on moving HEAD development of the
> three sork modules (excluding accounts) into an actual unified Sork module?
> Now that things are broken out into drivers, I think it would be much less
> messy to do it this way, and it might be simpler for people to install (not
> to mention reducing icons).
>
> Also, there's probably some code-sharing that could be accomplished; this
> would better accomodate things like Sieve that handle _both_ vacation and
> forwards, etc ...
>
> (I don't want to create a monster, but the possibility of rolling SAM and
> Ingo into a more coherent whole might be nice, too).
>
> -chuck
>
> --
> Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
> "After a few minutes the most aromatic and nice smelling Italian coffee
> will come out of the exhaustpipe." - Our stove-top espresso pot
> --
> Sork mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: sork-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
>
> ----- End message from chuck@horde.org -----