[sync] Why was wbxmlVersion moved into ContentHandler?

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Anthony Mills <amills at gascard.net>:

> ContentHandler knows nothing of wbxmlVersion.  I know both Encoder and
> Decoder extend ContentHandler, but it is not the logical place for it.
> ContentHandler should proabably be moved up and put into XML, SyncML is
> going to use it and it doesn't need to know about WBXML.  Does anyone
> agree or disagree?

It just seemed like common functionality to me. I guess I don't have much of a
sense of what the intended purpose/place of ContentHandler is. I'd be happy for
things to be organized to be cleaner/make more sense.

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck at horde.org>
"I'm really... I'm not too fascinated by green food." - Average Joe