[sync] New patch...

[Anthony Mills]

I agree it should be in it's own package. I think it will get too big 
for framework.  Can you have rpc call the package, or will it contain 
all it's own calling code?

Anthony

Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> Quoting Anthony Mills <amills at gascard.net>:
> 
> 
>>Here is a new patch, my last one did not go through.  This contains some code
>>for SyncML, mostly the SyncHdr tag.  I'll also include the command files.  I
>>have not finished converting the Sync commands, and it is not tested, but it
>>might be a few days before I can add some more.
> 
> 
> I've committed this, thanks.
> 
> I apologize for the waffling, but I'm having second thoughts about implementing
> all of this inside the Horde_RPC framework - I think we should provide a SyncML
> package, and use that from the RPC_syncml class. I'll try and organize the
> files you sent in CVS in such a package.
> 
> -chuck
> 
> --
> Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck at horde.org>
> "I'm really... I'm not too fascinated by green food." - Average Joe
>