[sync] Forcing Horde to request Authorization

Alex Masidlover alex.masidlover at axiomtech.co.uk
Mon Aug 21 07:10:42 PDT 2006


On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 16:24 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:13 +0100, Alex Masidlover wrote:
> 
> > We've got Evolution doing email and contacts fine (that's direct to Cyrus and
> > OpenLDAP), but for calendar/tasks we've only got read access through WebDAV or
> > Sync access through Multisync. This means we can only read the shared folders.
> > Are we missing a piece of the puzzle here - is there a full connectivity
> > solution for evolution?
> 
> The syncevolution connector (built on sync4j) can sync everything
> directly with Horde.

That does look like a good replacement for Multisync, but it doesn't
solve not being able to do multiple folders (specifically shared
calendars/tasks) - unless I'm missing something. In fact since SyncML
syncs to the default folder this will be the case for all SyncML
clients.

Has anyone looked at syncing against multiple calendars (could I simply
modify it to work through an array of calendar names set up in a SyncML
options area - or would this lead to non-unique ids?) Alternatively is
there any reason that I could not modify the backend to use
cal-[calendar name] connecting to [calendar name] instead of 'calendar'
connecting to the default calendar? I'm a perl coder mainly, but could
probably manage PHP at a push... But would appreciate anyone telling me
if what I'm thinking of doing is fundamentally flawed.

Alex

--
Alex Masidlover
Open Source Specialist
www.axiomtech.co.uk
www.zednax.com



More information about the sync mailing list