[Tickets #2212] RESOLVED: Inconsistent folder refresh location
bugs@bugs.horde.org
bugs at bugs.horde.org
Mon Jul 4 06:12:01 PDT 2005
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. THIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT MONITORED.
Ticket URL: http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/?id=2212
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket | 2212
Updated By | kevin_myer at iu13.org
Summary | Inconsistent folder refresh location
Queue | IMP
Version | HEAD
State | Bogus
Priority | 1. Low
Type | Bug
Owners |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
kevin_myer at iu13.org (2005-07-04 06:11) wrote:
>> If you go and read one of those messages, and are ready to move onto the
>> location of the next unread message, how do you do that?
>
> I'll posit that this is an entirely different issue than how the
> refresh icon behaves. You want a direct way to go to the next unread
> message. Using the INBOX icon or a refresh is a developer-like
> workaround IMHO, not normal user behavior. A normal user wants a
> button for it.
Not necessarily. I know that if I open a folder, I can expect to be taken
to the first unread message (or the end of the messages, if I have no unread
messages). I'm looking at a generalized implementation of the behavior of
the INBOX icon and since you've already got a Refresh, rather than take up
any more screen real estate, roll the functionality into refresh. I'll
grant that there will likely be users who dont' set mailbox_start to first
unread, but who would still use a navigation feature to go to the next
unread message. But I still think that Refresh should incorporate the
mailbox_start preference.
> That's a not unreasonable feature request. It's sometimes going to be
> tricky to define the "next" new message, but the sort order should
> handle it. If we can figure out a good UI/flow for it and someone
> writes the code, I have no problem including it.
Wouldn't it be using the same logic to determine which screen to display
when you initially open a folder? The message you initially were taken to
is now read (if you chose to read it). So getting the next unread message
would be the same as choosing a folder, no?
> So, if one of your "normal users" is looking at a specific set of
> messages in the mailbox view, and an automatic refresh happens, and
> they're taken to new mail and they then have to go *find* the
> messages they were looking at I don't think that will ever be
> intuitive, even for someone who checked off "always show me new
> mail". They *might* make the connection, but they'll still be annoyed.
Its happened to me on more than one occasion, with some annoyance, granted.
But the fact of the matter is that I believe most mail clients, when they
refresh, will reset the state of your view. I find myself trying to figure
out how to get to next screen with an unread message way more often than I
find my screen getting refreshed when I'm reading senders and subjects. If
I configure a mail client to take me to new mail, thats a choice I make, and
I realize a mail client can't possibly know what my conscious thought stream
is and elect not to refresh a screen, if I happen to be looking at it :)
More information about the bugs
mailing list