[Tickets #13852] Re: No Virtual Trash
noreply at bugs.horde.org
noreply at bugs.horde.org
Wed Feb 25 08:19:23 UTC 2015
BITTE NICHT AUF DIESE NACHRICHT ANTWORTEN. NACHRICHTEN AN DIESE
E-MAIL-ADRESSE WERDEN NICHT GELESEN.
Ticket-URL: https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/13852
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ticket | 13852
Aktualisiert Von | Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>
Zusammenfassung | No Virtual Trash
Warteschlange | IMP
Version | Git master
Typ | Bug
Status | Feedback
Priorität | 1. Low
Milestone |
Patch |
Zuständige | Michael Slusarz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org> (2015-02-25 09:19) hat geschrieben:
>>>> - You cannot undelete messages.
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>
>> Needs to be backported too. Thanks!
>
> Unfortunately, this isn't something that is directly backportable
> since message viewing has changed a bunch in IMP 7. Due to other
> time concerns (which I will hopefully be able to discuss very soon)
> I don't have the time to do the kind of involved backporting
> necessary for this.
This is very pity, because even if we are working on H6, we still need
to support H5 for some time, until the next major version is stable.
>>>> - You can drag messages from the VT to any folder while they stay deleted.
>>>
>>> The current behavior is correct. If you "move" a message out of
>>> Virtual Trash, it will disappear from virtual trash. But since the
>>> message has a deleted flag, it will "re-appear" when the virtual
>>> trash is explicitly refreshed (i.e. the search is run again). This
>>> is consistent semantics with every other search mailbox.
>>
>> It's not the same completely. Because if you move from a search
>> mailbox to a folder so that it doesn't match the search criteria
>> anymore, it works like a regular mailbox.
>
> Exactly my point.
This is what I was trying to say. ;-) In this case it works correctly.
>> And that's the more
>> important point. If we use the folder semantics with search results,
>> we need to use the folder semantics in user interaction too. Where we
>> cannot guarantee this interaction behavior, we need to disable it. If
>> we don't want to re-run the search immediately (which would be the
>> correct behavior) because it is too performance hungry, we need to
>> disable moving out of search folders.
>
> Why? Again... this is how every mailbox works... when you move a
> message out, it disappears. And all search mailboxes are not
> refreshed until explicitly told to. (There is a difference in
> semantics between search and non-search mailboxes, but that is OK
> because there is explicit visual indication - via the searchbar - of
> this difference).
>
> I guess I'm confused what you think you should be seeing. Moving a
> message out of the Virtual Trash should not cause that message to
> remain in the Virtual Trash. I'm not sure what other behavior you
> are expecting. (i.e. moving a message out of Virtual Trash to a
> different mailbox MUST cause the message to be initially removed
> from the virtual trash, since delivery to a mailbox could possibly
> result in the \deleted flag being removed, for example).
I have to admit that in the case of moving a message out of a search
folder while still meeting the search requirements, both possible
behaviors may make sense, but may also be confusing. If I stick with
my folder semantics, the current behavior is indeed correct, the
message disappears from the current folder. It's still a bit confusing
if the message re-appears on the next visit, but probably less
confusing than the message instantly re-appearing.
That leaves that second example of dragging from virtual trash. In
this case, it can be safely assumed that the user want's to undelete
the message, just like he would do when dragging from a regular trash
folder. What we need to do is not only to move the message to the drop
target (if it wasn't already from this folder), but also to remove the
\deleted flag. In this use case the folder metaphor not only works
instantly, but also permanently.
More information about the bugs
mailing list