showing images inline
Michael Bull
mbull@uoguelph.ca
Thu, 01 Mar 2001 11:00:48 -0500
What is required to have IMP 2.3 show jpgs inline? Is this available now,
or would it be an extra feature?
I tried adding inline => true on the mime.php, but it didn't seem to change
anything.
Regards,
Mike.
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:04:43 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 52114 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2001 16:05:43 -0000
Received: from 208-59-178-62.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO marina.horde.org) (208.59.178.62)
by horde.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2001 16:05:43 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 9AB623CAA; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:04:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 206.243.191.252 ( [206.243.191.252])
as user chuck@marina.horde.org by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:04:43 -0500
Message-ID: <983462683.3a9e731b7ced5@marina.horde.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:04:43 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [dev] showing images inline
Quoting Michael Bull <mbull@uoguelph.ca>:
> What is required to have IMP 2.3 show jpgs inline? Is this available now,
> or would it be an extra feature?
Right now we don't do it. It wouldn't be that much trouble, but with a big
picture it'd throw the browser _way_ out of whack...
Also, what do people think about forgetting the 'inline' option (except for
maybe html attachments) and just going by the content-disposition (inline =>
inline, attachment => new window) of the part?
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"We have no fuel on board, plus or minus 8 kilograms." -A NASA scientist