[dev] why mimp?

[jan@horde.org]

Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>:

> Quoting jan@horde.org:
> 
> > Why to put a mobile imp version into its own module?
> > As most of the logic would be the same in imp and mimp - and of course
> also
> > bugs and their fixes - why not keep it the same as it was started some time
> ago 
> > with horde/turba: use different templates for wml output and share the
> logic.
> 
> Because when I started working on it, I realized that there are a lot of
> things
> which just aren't going to carry over, and a lot of logic that IMP does
> that
> just is unnecessary. I plan on having them share preferences, libraries,
> and
> config files as much as possible, but I think the actual scripts out to be
> different.

OK, but then we should perhaps put the mimp specific scripts into imp as well 
as the templates. That would make the use of common library and config files 
easier.

Or do fear to much overhead by putting the mimp stuff into the imp module?

Jan.