[dev] Last-minute reminder: OSCON talks
Brent J. Nordquist
bjn@horde.org
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:31:05 -0600 (CST)
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Jan Schneider <jan@horde.org> wrote:
> What I currently have is based on the xml-rpc extension. It consists of a
> rpc.php file sitting in the horde directory that provides an rpc interface
> to all methods defined by the registry and callable by a function.
>
> What I plan is to extend Horde apps that provide a servers or sources
> definition (currently only Turba) with a new backend driver that can be
> remote Horde installation. This driver calls then the rpc.php file of the
> other installation.
This sounds really interesting!
One question for you: any particular reason why you are using XML-RPC and
not SOAP? I looked at both a little while back and decided that XML-RPC
seemed more mature, but SOAP seemed to be where industry momentum is. I
haven't really started developing anything yet and I would love to hear
your thoughts before I do.
--
Brent J. Nordquist <bjn@horde.org> N0BJN / OPN: #horde
Yahoo!: Brent_Nordquist / AIM: BrentJNordquist / ICQ: 76158942
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:40:46 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 5883 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 15:41:25 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.196.127)
by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 15:41:25 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 11AD839CE; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:40:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.116 ( [192.168.0.116])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:40:46 -0500
Message-ID: <1015429246.3c86387edb37a@marina.horde.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:40:46 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
References: <1015426314.3c862d0aef739@horde.riboflavin.net>
In-Reply-To: <1015426314.3c862d0aef739@horde.riboflavin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Subject: Re: [dev] Question about style
Quoting "Marcus I. Ryan" <marcus@riboflavin.net>:
> Okay..I'm just curious on this, after seeing what changes you made to my
> contacts.php file. I noticed that you went through and wrapped the
> comments to be less than 70 columns, but not all the comments. Also, we
> have many, many lines in Horde that are MUCH longer than 70 columns.
> I'm just curious why? Why do we wrap comments, but not long lines? Why
> not wrap all comments (unless you just missed a couple)?
I probably missed a couple. You should read horde/docs/CODING_STANDARDS; I just
added a note on line wrapping there, and everything else there is important
info too.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"A dream which helps you to live your reality with dignity
and justice is a good dream." - Tariq Ramadan
>From jan@horde.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:46:05 +0100
Return-Path: <jan@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 7131 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 15:46:26 -0000
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (194.25.134.17)
by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 15:46:26 -0000
Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de
by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 16idcW-000205-0J; Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:46:24 +0100
Received: from linux.wg.de (320034214675-0001@[217.225.42.242]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 16idcR-0b6mCuC; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:46:19 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by linux.wg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id g26Fk5R14871
for <dev@lists.horde.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:46:05 +0100
Received: from 192.168.60.137 ( [192.168.60.137])
as user jan@linux by jan.dip.ammma.net with HTTP;
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:46:04 +0100
Message-ID: <1015429564.3c8639bd03dee@jan.dip.ammma.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:46:05 +0100
From: Jan Schneider <jan@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203060928240.16602-100000@kepler.acns.bethel.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203060928240.16602-100000@kepler.acns.bethel.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
X-Sender: 320034214675-0001@t-dialin.net
Subject: Re: [dev] Last-minute reminder: OSCON talks
Zitat von "Brent J. Nordquist" <bjn@horde.org>:
> One question for you: any particular reason why you are using XML-RPC
> and
> not SOAP? I looked at both a little while back and decided that
> XML-RPC
> seemed more mature, but SOAP seemed to be where industry momentum is.
> I
> haven't really started developing anything yet and I would love to hear
> your thoughts before I do.
I was also thinking about which rpc implementation to use. I'd prefer SOAP
for the same reason you pointed out but the pear class was quite unusable
when I started this. There is currently a lot of work on the module in pear
so perhaps I'll switch to it as soon as it becomes more mature. On the
other hand SOAP has a lot of overhead that doesn't seem necessary to me so
I'm still irresolute.
Jan.
--
http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project
http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge
http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:48:04 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 8330 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 15:48:43 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.196.127)
by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 15:48:43 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id A7A2739B0; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:48:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.116 ( [192.168.0.116])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:48:04 -0500
Message-ID: <1015429684.3c863a347cbc9@marina.horde.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:48:04 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203060928240.16602-100000@kepler.acns.bethel.edu> <1015429564.3c8639bd03dee@jan.dip.ammma.net>
In-Reply-To: <1015429564.3c8639bd03dee@jan.dip.ammma.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Subject: Re: [dev] Last-minute reminder: OSCON talks
Quoting Jan Schneider <jan@horde.org>:
> I was also thinking about which rpc implementation to use. I'd prefer SOAP
> for the same reason you pointed out but the pear class was quite unusable
> when I started this. There is currently a lot of work on the module in pear
> so perhaps I'll switch to it as soon as it becomes more mature. On the
> other hand SOAP has a lot of overhead that doesn't seem necessary to me so
> I'm still irresolute.
I see no reason not to support both, personally...
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"A dream which helps you to live your reality with dignity
and justice is a good dream." - Tariq Ramadan
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:05:49 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 15385 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 17:06:28 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.196.127)
by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 17:06:28 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 7839A39CE; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:05:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.116 ( [192.168.0.116])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:05:49 -0500
Message-ID: <1015434349.3c864c6d4d3ae@marina.horde.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:05:49 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0203060126260.28764-100000@carousel.tabcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0203060126260.28764-100000@carousel.tabcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Subject: Re: [dev] Getting rid of email composition stuff in Turba?
Quoting Apis Hytt <php3dev@carousel.tabcat.com>:
> o I start in Turba when I just want to send outgoing mails ..
> as it is faster than waiting for INBOX to fill if one
> starts with IMP when needing multiple address choices.
This isn't a reason to keep it; you can choose to start IMP on a different page.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"A dream which helps you to live your reality with dignity
and justice is a good dream." - Tariq Ramadan
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:40:59 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 20852 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 17:41:38 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.196.127)
by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 17:41:38 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 0A40A39CE; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:41:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.116 ( [192.168.0.116])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:40:59 -0500
Message-ID: <1015436459.3c8654abd026c@marina.horde.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:40:59 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: dev@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Subject: New release question
I'm not clear, based on our previous discussions about release engineering,
whether or not we are going to make sure that IMP 3.1 works with Horde 2.0.
Doing so would mean we were adhering a bit more to our API and backwards
compatibility. However, the new releases of Nag and Kronolith would only work
with Horde 2.1, and I think that might be confusing to people... I need to
upgrade Horde for Nag but not for IMP? etc...
A concrete example of where this is a problem is the new Notification
framework, which Nag and Kronolith depend on, but which isn't in Horde 2.0. We
haven't yet merged it into RELENG_2, and IMP's RELENG_3 doesn't rely on it. But
we will need a version of Horde with it to release Kronolith and Nag.
Thoughts?
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"A dream which helps you to live your reality with dignity
and justice is a good dream." - Tariq Ramadan