[dev] Small patch for horde/templates/prefs/select.inc
Chuck Hagenbuch
chuck@horde.org
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:42:17 -0400
Quoting Eric Rostetter <eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu>:
> Yes. I can live with "status" and "active/inactive" are great. Should
> we use "nomenu" (to say don't put it in the menu) or "menu" (to say DO put
> it in the menu) though -- maybe "menu" would be better? Either way is
> fine. "hidden" is cool, as long as it implies "nomenu" also.
Yes, hidden would imply nomenu. I would rather have "nomenu" than "menu";
here's why: I think that "active" is most intuitive as the active "end of
things"; ie, in order of least to most, things would be:
inactive
hidden
nomenu
active
Using "menu" instead would make it:
inactive
hidden
active
menu
... and it just seems weird to me to have "active" in the middle.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"After a few minutes the most aromatic and nice smelling Italian coffee
will come out of the exhaustpipe." - Our stove-top espresso pot