[dev] Migration of IMP filters to ingo (soon)
Sebastian Calero Laguia
scalero at datadec.es
Thu Jun 5 00:08:55 PDT 2003
> Quoting Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com>:
>
> | On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 08:56, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> | > Quoting Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com>:
> | >
> | > > ack! Client side filtering won't work AT ALL?
> | >
> | > *sigh* No.
> |
> | Your sigh is throwing me off..
> |
> | Is that:
> | *sigh*, Unfortunately it won't work.
> | or
> | *heavy sigh* <shaking head>, you idiot, of course it will work.
>
> Quite possibly, my description was lacking. What will happen is as
follows:
> 1) All the filtering code (e.g. prefs, manipulation, actual filtering)
will
> be removed from the _IMP_ codebase.
> 2) All of this code will be moved to the _ingo_ codebase.
>
> client-side IMAP filtering is *not* going away, it is just moving modules.
> Thus, to continue using client-side filtering, you must configure ingo.
> IMP will seamlessly work with ingo to continue to provide the filtering
> capabilities.
>
> michael
>
> ______________________________________________
> Michael Slusarz [slusarz at bigworm.colorado.edu]
> The University of Colorado at Boulder
Why do not maintain the _IMP_ filtering code? How can we filter the body of
messages with Ingo? This is a limitation of sieve, not?
Greetings...
Sebastian Calero
Datadec Online.
More information about the dev
mailing list