Fwd: RE: [dev] Releasing Horde 3.0

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

The time frame is, WHENEVER THIS IS DONE. This is the roadblock.

----- Forwarded message from derek at derekmartin.homedns.org -----
    Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:21:00 -0500
    From: Derek Martin <derek at derekmartin.homedns.org>
Reply-To: Derek Martin <derek at derekmartin.homedns.org>
 Subject: RE: [dev] Releasing Horde 3.0
      To: 'Chuck Hagenbuch' <chuck at horde.org>

I like this idea, it allows much more flexability.  What is the time frame
on 3.0?
Derek


Derek Martin
YOU Networks Administrator
http://you.okstate.edu
derek at younet.okstate.edu
The World According to Derek


-----Original Message-----
From: dev-bounces at lists.horde.org [mailto:dev-bounces at lists.horde.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hagenbuch
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:10 PM
To: dev at lists.horde.org
Subject: [dev] Releasing Horde 3.0


As far as I'm concerned, the *only* showstopper for releasing Horde 3.0 is
breaking our libs out into packages that are seperately upgradeable, so that
we can do *many* more feature-adds/upgrades of both Horde and modules just
by requiring new versions of, say, the Data package for a new version of
Kronolith.

Everything else can be done incrementally. That needs to be in place and
solid so that we don't have to do major version releases so often, and can
roll HEAD features out quickly.

Comments/questions/etc.?

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck at horde.org>
The alligators were there, too, in a bathtub inside the house.


--
Horde developers mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: dev-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org



----- End forwarded message -----


-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck at horde.org>
The alligators were there, too, in a bathtub inside the house.