[dev] [cvs] commit: ansel/lib api.php

[Michael Rubinsky]

Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:

> Without looking at the code, it might make more sense for an external
> API to hide internal IDs, OTOH we don't follow that paradigm in other
> APIs either. But the API for an application should at least be
> consistent, I guess.

I agree about hiding the datatree_id from external apps, and was how I  
was actually expecting the api to operate...but just about every one  
of the methods that needs information about a gallery expects the  
datatree_id.

Since ansel has not been released yet, would it be feasable to rewrite  
the api to expect the more appropriate share name?  It's how I would  
have preferred to do this, but was concerned about making such a large  
change to the api...

Thanks,
mike

--
The Horde Project (www.horde.org)
mrubinsk at horde.org