[dev] Proposal for _group_hook

Chuck Hagenbuch chuck at horde.org
Fri Aug 18 09:26:42 PDT 2006


Quoting Mike Dorman <dorm at dorm.org>:

> Anyone have any thoughts on changing the method for doing group  
> hooks to _group_hook($groupName, $userName) instead of  
> _group_hook_groupName($userName)?
>
> This will allow for determining which groups have hooks  
> programatically, rather than manually having to create the hook for  
> each group.
>
> I'm not sure if there is much of a performance implication.  The  
> function_exists() call would be for _group_hook, and if it exists  
> would then call it.  So I don't think there would be any extra  
> function calls.

This does make sense to me. Ben, Jan, other people who use complicated  
groups setups - any problems here?

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris


More information about the dev mailing list