[dev] Proposal for _group_hook
Chuck Hagenbuch
chuck at horde.org
Fri Aug 18 09:26:42 PDT 2006
Quoting Mike Dorman <dorm at dorm.org>:
> Anyone have any thoughts on changing the method for doing group
> hooks to _group_hook($groupName, $userName) instead of
> _group_hook_groupName($userName)?
>
> This will allow for determining which groups have hooks
> programatically, rather than manually having to create the hook for
> each group.
>
> I'm not sure if there is much of a performance implication. The
> function_exists() call would be for _group_hook, and if it exists
> would then call it. So I don't think there would be any extra
> function calls.
This does make sense to me. Ben, Jan, other people who use complicated
groups setups - any problems here?
-chuck
--
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris
More information about the dev
mailing list